Core questions
- Who is the account?
- Where did the authentication originate?
- When did it occur?
- How was the session established?
- Was MFA involved?
- What happened after success?
Use a structured method for investigating failed and successful authentication activity across Windows, Linux, VPN and identity systems.
Authentication investigations should answer who, where, when, how and what happened after access was obtained.
Use this page after the daily quiz: learn the concept first, then follow the investigation workflow and examples.
A source attempts one password against many accounts. Which investigation concept should you consider: brute force, password spraying, or neither without more evidence?
Quiz flow: introduce this topic briefly on social media, ask the question, reveal the answer, then send learners here for the detailed investigation.
A useful authentication review starts with a bounded time window and the identity’s normal pattern. Compare source device, location context, MFA result, application, and what the account did immediately after access. A successful sign-in following failures is a lead to validate, not proof by itself.
In the synthetic cases, build a short timeline and check whether the user, device, and follow-on actions agree. Treat travel estimates, shared egress IPs, service accounts, and VPN changes as context that can explain an unusual sign-in.
Continue practicing: open a fictional mission and test your reasoning against the simulated evidence.